Nice to see that Washington Post calls out Myhrvold’s pattern of anti-social behavior in the software realm as their intro to reporting on his non-peer-reviewed asteroid paper. (Maybe Myhrvold was afraid that journals would have trouble finding a panel of ex-academic patent trolls to review his paper?)

On Monday, the New York Times published a piece on Nathan P. Myhrvold, former chief technologist of Microsoft. Myhrvold, who has built a reputation for himself as something of a patent troll, says he’s shown that NASA’s research on asteroids is a mess.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/05/25/that-study-critiquing-nasas-bad-science-on-asteroids-is-pretty-bad-science/

That study critiquing NASA’s ‘bad science’ on asteroids is pretty bad science


Imported from Google+ — content and formatting may not be reliable